.png)
Pricing Strategy Explained: The 4 Types & When to Use Each
Explore the 4 pricing strategies: cost-plus, value-based, competitive, and dynamic. Learn which business pricing approach works best for your product.
.png)
A statement we hear more often that not by product leaders is that their biggest pricing mistake wasn't picking the wrong number. It was using competitive pricing when they needed dynamic pricing to win market share fast. They'd spent three months benchmarking competitors and landed at $79/month. Reasonable price. Wrong strategy. Six months later, they had the board asking why growth stalled.
Most product leaders know they need a pricing strategy, but they treat it like a one-time decision instead of a toolkit. In our product pricing framework guide, we talked you through defining the five foundational inputs. Now you need to choose which of the four pricing strategies actually gets you where you're going to position yourself within the range you identified. Cost-plus, value-based, competitive, or dynamic. Each one works in specific situations and fails in others. This guide walks through when to use each strategy, what signals tell you it's time to switch, and how to combine strategies across customer segments without confusing your market.
TL;DR:
- The 4 pricing strategies (cost-plus, value-based, competitive, dynamic) are tools, not permanent decisions
- Your business stage and market position determine which strategy works best in this moment in time, not forever
- Most successful companies switch strategies as they scale from growth to profitability
- You can use different strategies across customer segments, but only with clear reasoning
What is a Pricing Strategy?
In our product pricing framework guide, we covered the research you need before setting your price. You learned how to identify your business goals, value metrics, customer willingness to pay, competitive landscape, and cost structure. Those five components answer what range you can price in and what you should charge for.
A pricing strategy picks where you position within that range. It's your competitive approach. Do you price below the market to grab customers fast? Match competitors to stay in the game? Price high based on the value you deliver?
Understanding Pricing Framework vs. Pricing Strategy vs. Pricing Model
Product pricing gets confusing when teams mix up three separate decisions: pricing framework, strategy and model. Each one serves a different purpose. Get them straight and your pricing makes sense. Mix them up and you're left guessing.
Pricing framework is research. It answers: what data do we need to decide? Costs, willingness to pay, competitive data, business goals, TAM/SAM/SOM, value metrics. The framework gives you the inputs. The strategy tells you how to use them.
Pricing strategy is positioning. It answers: where do we sit relative to competitors and the value we deliver? The 4 pricing strategies are cost-plus, value-based, competitive, and dynamic. Your business pricing strategy determines if you're the budget option, the premium choice, or somewhere in between.
Pricing model is structure. It answers: how do customers pay us? Per user, per feature, per usage, flat fee. Your model defines what customers are billed for and when.
Teams that skip the framework jump straight to picking a strategy. They copy what competitors charge without knowing if that matches their goals. Or they price based on costs alone and miss what customers will actually pay. The framework work comes first. Pricing strategy decisions come after.
The Importance of a Pricing Strategy
The strategy you pick changes everything downstream. Pick dynamic pricing and you'll attract price-sensitive buyers. Some will churn when you raise prices later. Pick value-based pricing and you'll grow slower but with healthier unit economics. Pick competitive pricing without differentiation and you're stuck matching every price drop in your category.
The most common pricing strategies in B2B SaaS are value-based and competitive. But what works for a competitor might be wrong for you. Their business model is different. Their customer segment is different. Their USPs and goals are different.
That's why this guide walks through the 4 pricing strategies in detail. When each one works. When each one fails. How to know which fits your situation right now. Because pricing strategy isn't permanent. It's a tool you swap out as your product and market evolve.
The 4 Pricing Strategies That Shape Your Business Pricing Strategy
Let’s look at the four models we just described above. You'll hear about all four in pricing conversations, but most teams only understand one or two well enough to use them right.
Cost-Plus Pricing Strategy
Cost-plus is one of the most common pricing strategies you'll see, especially in industries where you can track every dollar that goes into making something. It's simple math. Take what it costs you to build or deliver your product, add a percentage on top, and that's your price. If your product costs $50 to make and you want a 30% margin, you charge $65.
Retail uses this constantly. A store buys inventory for $20 per item and sells it for $40. That 100% markup covers their rent, staff, and profit. Manufacturing companies do it too. They know exactly what raw materials and production time cost, so they can price with confidence.
When Cost-Plus Product Pricing Works Best
This approach fits specific situations. When your costs are predictable and transparent, cost-plus makes sense. You're not guessing. You know your numbers.
Here's when it works:
- Stable markets where costs don't swing wildly. If your suppliers change prices every month, cost-plus becomes a moving target.
- Customers expect pricing tied to materials. Construction projects, manufacturing contracts, and custom fabrication often work this way. The buyer knows what steel costs. They understand the markup.
- Margin protection is your main goal. You need to guarantee profitability on every sale. Cost-plus ensures you never sell at a loss.
- Commoditized products where differentiation is low. When everyone's product is basically the same, competing on cost makes sense.
Infrastructure products fit here. Data center hardware. Industrial equipment. Bulk materials. The product does a job and the price reflects what it costs to deliver that job.
When This Pricing Strategy Fails
Cost-plus ignores two critical things: what customers will actually pay and what your competitors charge. That's a problem. The strategy fails when:
- Customer value perception doesn't match your costs. Maybe your product saves customers $10,000 a month but only costs you $100 to deliver. Charging $150 because of your costs is leaving money on the table.
- Competitive dynamics force different positioning. If everyone in your category charges $99 and you calculate you need to charge $67, you'll confuse buyers. They'll wonder what's lacking in your product.
- Your costs decrease but customer value stays the same. Software scales beautifully. Your cost per customer drops as you grow, but the value you deliver doesn't change. Dropping prices just because your costs fell can hurt you.
Real Examples: Where Cost-Plus Product Pricing Works in Software
Cost-plus pricing strategy appears in software when buyers need to see exactly where their money goes. Transparency matters more than value promises in these markets. Here are three situations where this business pricing strategy actually works.
Government Defense Contracts Run on Cost-Plus
Government agencies buy software differently than private companies. They use cost-plus contracts where the vendor bills for actual costs plus a fixed profit margin.
The U.S. Department of Defense awarded Cromulence LLC a $9.9M cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for cyber software and hardware in space systems. The vendor tracks every engineering hour, every software license, every piece of infrastructure. Then they add the agreed profit percentage on top.
This pricing strategy makes sense for government buyers. Auditors can trace every dollar. Procurement teams know they're not overpaying. The vendor proves their costs through documentation.
Private sector software rarely works this way. But when you're selling to federal agencies or defense contractors, cost-plus is often required in the RFP.
Enterprise Software Implementation Services
Before SaaS took over, implementing enterprise software was a separate service business. Companies like SAP and Oracle sold licenses for fixed prices. But getting that software running? That's where cost-plus came in.
SAP implementation partners like Accenture, Deloitte, and Capgemini billed clients using hourly rates. The math was straightforward: take the cost of your consultants (salary, benefits, overhead), add 15-50% margin, and that's your rate.
A consultant costing the firm $100/hour might be billed at $175/hour. Custom coding, data migration, configuration work. All priced the same way. Clients accepted this because they could compare rates across firms.
Out-of-the-box SaaS killed most of this model. Now implementation is often bundled into the software price or handled with lighter-touch onboarding. But you still see cost-plus for complex enterprise rollouts where the scope is uncertain and clients want billing transparency.
Managed Hosting Before Cloud Commoditized Infrastructure
Early SaaS companies didn't have AWS. They needed to explain their hosting costs to customers who were used to running their own servers.
Rackspace's pricing separated infrastructure from service layers. Customers paid the actual cloud cost plus a markup for management and engineering support. If your servers cost Rackspace $500/month, you might pay $700/month total.
This pricing strategy worked because costs were visible and customers understood what they were buying. Server time wasn't abstract. Neither was bandwidth or storage; because early SaaS customers often ran their own servers before switching to hosted solutions.
As cloud infrastructure became cheaper and more standardized, most companies switched away from showing these costs. Customers stopped caring about the underlying infrastructure. They cared about outcomes. That's when value-based pricing took over.
Value-Based Pricing Strategy
Value-based pricing is the most common pricing strategy in B2B SaaS once you get past the early stage. Instead of looking at your costs or what competitors charge, you price based on what customers actually get out of your product. If your software saves a company $500,000 a year, charging $50,000 becomes an easy conversation.
The math is simple. Figure out the ROI your customer achieves. Then capture a portion of that value. Not all of it. Just enough that both sides win.
What is a Pricing Strategy Based on Customer Outcomes?
Value-based product pricing ties your price to measurable results. Analytics platforms that help marketing teams optimize spend can point to millions saved. CRMs that increase sales conversion rates can show an increase in revenue. Project management tools that cut delivery time can quantify hours recovered.
You're not charging for features. You're charging for the outcome those features produce.
This business pricing strategy requires proof. You need data showing what happens when customers use your product. Case studies. Before-and-after metrics. Customer interviews where they explain the impact. Without that evidence, value-based pricing is just expensive guessing.
When Value-Based Product Pricing Works Best
Value-based pricing fits specific situations. If you check these boxes, it's worth testing.
- Clear differentiation from competitors. If you do something others can't, customers will pay for that capability. A SaaS platform that processes data 10x faster than alternatives has a value story. A tool that looks like every other tool in the category doesn't.
- Measurable customer value. You need to track outcomes. Revenue increased. Costs reduced. Time saved. Errors prevented. If you can't measure it, you can't price against it.
- Enterprise sales cycles. Buyers at this level care about ROI. They build business cases. They need to justify spend to finance teams. Value-based pricing gives them the numbers they need to get approval.
- High switching costs or integration depth. Once your product is embedded in a customer's workflow, its value compounds. The longer they use it, the harder it becomes to replace. Pricing can reflect that growing dependency.
When This Pricing Strategy Fails
Value-based pricing breaks in specific conditions. Understanding what is a failure mode of a pricing strategy matters as much as knowing when it works.
- Unclear value proposition. If you can't explain what your product does or why it matters, don't try to price on value. Customers won't pay for vague promises. You'll lose deals to competitors with simpler stories.
- Commoditized markets. When every product does the same thing, value differentiation disappears. Email marketing platforms all send emails. Basic invoicing software all creates invoices. In these categories, competitive pricing usually wins over value-based approaches.
- Early-stage products without proof. You need evidence to support value claims. New products don't have case studies yet. They don't have years of customer data. Trying to charge premium prices before you can prove outcomes usually results in slow sales.
- Self-serve or low-touch sales. Value-based pricing requires conversation. Someone needs to understand the customer's situation, calculate potential ROI, and explain why the price makes sense. That doesn't work when customers sign up with a credit card and never talk to anyone.
Real Examples: Value-Based Pricing Use Cases
Modern Project Management Tools (Charging for Business Value, Not Seats)
Asana and Monday didn't win by being cheaper. They priced based on the economic value of better workflows and recovered time, not what it cost them to run servers.
Think about a team burning $80/hour on employee time. If workflow automation saves them 20 hours a month, that's $1,600 in value. Suddenly a $50/seat price looks like a steal. Cost-plus pricing would have landed them somewhere much lower and left money on the table.
Customers weren't buying "project management software." They were buying faster shipping, fewer miscommunications, and meetings they didn't have to attend.
HubSpot CRM & Marketing Hub (Value Scales With Revenue, Not Usage)
HubSpot built its pricing around what customers could earn, not what they used. Their features are priced based on their impact on customer acquisition, not their technical complexity.
A company doing $3M in ARR can justify HubSpot’s Professional or Enterprise plan because even a 5–10% improvement in inbound lead conversion covers the full subscription cost many times over.
HubSpot has always connected pricing to business outcomes: more qualified leads, better nurturing, faster pipeline movement. The price reflects what customers gain, not what HubSpot spends.
Competitive Pricing Strategy: When Product Pricing Follows the Market
Competitive pricing means setting your price based on what similar products charge. You look at your direct competitors, see what they ask for, and position yourself somewhere in that range. Maybe slightly below. Maybe at the same level. Sometimes above if you can justify it.
This business pricing strategy sounds simple because it is. You don't need complex calculations. You just need to know what everyone else charges and decide where you fit.
What Is a Pricing Strategy Built on Competitor Benchmarks?
When teams ask "what is a pricing strategy based on competitors?" the answer comes down to market reference points. You're not calculating costs or measuring customer outcomes. You're reading the room.
A project management tool entering a crowded space looks at Asana, Monday, Basecamp, and ClickUp. All of them sit in roughly the same price band. The new entrant picks a spot that makes sense given their features and market position. Maybe they go lower to attract price-sensitive buyers. Maybe they match the leaders to signal comparable quality.
CRM systems work the same way. Salesforce sets the high end. HubSpot captures the mid-market. Dozens of smaller players fill the gaps below. Each one prices relative to the others because buyers compare them directly.
When Competitive Product Pricing Works Best
This approach fits specific situations well. Not every market. Not every product. But when conditions align, competitive pricing removes friction from the buying process.
- Crowded markets with established price expectations. Buyers in saturated categories already know what things cost. They've seen the pricing pages. They've compared options. If you show up 3x higher than everyone else, you need a very innovative reason. If you show up 3x lower, they'll assume something's lacking. Competitive pricing keeps you in the conversation.
- Feature parity with alternatives. When your product does roughly what others do, price becomes a decision factor. Buyers can't point to unique capabilities that justify a premium. They look at price, support, and integrations. Being in the expected range keeps you competitive.
- Need to stay in the consideration set. Some buying decisions start with budget. If a procurement team has $50 per user per month to spend, every product above that limit gets cut from the list before demos even happen. Competitive pricing ensures you make it past the first filter.
The Most Common Pricing Strategies in Saturated Markets
Why do so many companies use competitive pricing? Because the alternative feels risky.
Value-based pricing requires proof. Case studies. ROI calculations. Confident sales teams. Cost-plus pricing ignores what customers will actually pay. Dynamic pricing creates complexity.
Competitive pricing offers a shortcut. You know buyers will accept the price because competitors already charge it. The market has validated the range. You're not guessing.
Monday.com and Asana both charge roughly $10-25 per user per month. Neither invented that range. It emerged from years of market development. New entrants see those numbers and position accordingly.
The same pattern appears in CRM. Pipedrive, Freshsales, and Zoho CRM all cluster around similar price points. They watch each other. When one moves, others consider following.
When This Business Pricing Strategy Fails
Competitive pricing has real limitations. It can trap you in situations that hurt long-term growth.
- Race to the bottom. If everyone competes on price, someone eventually goes lower. Then someone else matches them. Then another round of cuts. Eventually you're fighting for scraps with margins too thin to invest in product development and you have set impossible expectations with your prospective and existing clients.
- Unclear differentiation. When your price matches competitors but your product doesn't stand out, buyers pick based on brand recognition or existing relationships. You become a commodity. The sale goes to whoever has the bigger marketing budget or the existing vendor relationship.
- Leaving money on the table. Some customers would pay more if they get massive value from your product. But because you priced against competitors instead of outcomes, you never capture that value.
- Copying competitors who got it wrong. Here's the trap nobody talks about. What if the competitor you're benchmarking against chose the wrong pricing strategy? Maybe they're losing money. Maybe they're funded by venture capital and burning cash to buy market share. You copy their price and inherit their problems.
The Importance of Pricing Strategy Fit in Competitive Markets
Competitive pricing isn't bad. It's a tool. The importance of pricing strategy shows up in knowing when to use which approach:
- Early stage, undifferentiated product, crowded market? Competitive pricing keeps you in the game while you figure out what makes you different.
- Established product with clear value story? Maybe it's time to shift toward value-based pricing and capture more of what you create.
The project management and CRM categories both show this evolution. Leaders like Salesforce started with competitive positioning. As they built proof points and enterprise capabilities, they shifted to value-based approaches for their top tiers.
Your pricing strategy should match your current situation and the current market. And situations and markets change. The 4P's of pricing strategy discussions often miss this. Product, Price, Place, Promotion all interact. When your product evolves, your price can too. Competitive pricing might be right for today. Value-based might be right for next year.
Real Examples: Competitive Pricing in Action
- Notion vs. Coda vs. Confluence. All three tools solve documentation and collaboration needs. All three price within a similar range for team plans. Notion didn't try to charge 5x more than Confluence. They positioned competitively, then added features that created switching momentum. Price got them in the door. Product kept customers.
- Freshdesk vs. Zendesk. Freshdesk entered a market Zendesk dominated. They priced below Zendesk's entry tier, targeting companies who found Zendesk too expensive for their needs. Classic competitive positioning with a twist: aim at the low end of the leader's range rather than matching exactly.
Dynamic Pricing Strategy: When Your Business Pricing Strategy Needs to Flex
Dynamic pricing is exactly what it sounds like. Your price changes based on what's happening in the market right now. Demand spikes? Price goes up. Competitor drops their rate? You adjust. Season shifts? Your pricing moves with it.
This pricing strategy treats price as a living number, not a fixed decision. Airlines invented it. Hotels perfected it. And now companies are figuring out how to make it work for software.
What Is a Pricing Strategy That Adapts in Real Time?
Dynamic pricing pulls data from multiple sources and uses it to set prices that change over time. The inputs might include customer demand, competitor pricing, time of day, inventory levels, or usage patterns.
In product pricing, this usually shows up in two forms. First, usage-based pricing where customers pay for what they consume. Second, time-sensitive pricing where rates shift based on demand cycles.
The core idea is simple. When demand is high and supply is limited, charge more. When demand drops, lower the price to attract buyers. Airlines do this constantly. A flight to Barcelona might cost $400 on Tuesday and $900 on Friday for the exact same seat.
When Dynamic Product Pricing Works Best
Dynamic pricing fits specific situations. Not every product. Not every market. But when conditions line up, it can outperform fixed pricing by a wide margin.
- Volatile markets with unpredictable demand. If your customers buy more during certain seasons, events, or economic conditions, dynamic pricing captures that value. Amazon adjusts product prices millions of times per day based on demand, competitor pricing, and inventory levels. During Black Friday, prices on popular items shift every few minutes. A $299 TV might drop to $249 at 8 AM, climb back to $279 by noon when inventory runs low. Pricing is dynamic.
- High demand fluctuation. When your product experiences sudden spikes or drops in interest, fixed pricing leaves money on the table during peaks and struggles to attract buyers during lulls. Dynamic pricing smooths this out.
- Usage-based business models. If customers pay for what they use (API calls, storage, compute time, active users), dynamic pricing is built into the structure. The price automatically scales with consumption.
Why This Pricing Strategy Fails for SaaS Products
Dynamic pricing looks smart on paper. In practice, it breaks down in ways that damage customer relationships and complicate operations.
- Customer confusion kills trust. When the same product costs different amounts at different times, customers notice. They start gaming the system, waiting for prices to drop, or feeling cheated when they paid more than someone else.
- Perception of unfairness destroys goodwill. Airlines can get away with dynamic pricing because everyone expects it. But when a software company charges different rates to different customers for the same product, it feels unfair. Even if the logic makes sense internally, customers see it as price gouging.
- Implementation complexity drains resources. Dynamic pricing requires infrastructure. You need real-time data on demand, competitor prices, and customer behavior. You need systems that can adjust prices automatically. You need monitoring to catch mistakes before they hit customers. Most companies underestimate this. They think they can build a simple algorithm and let it run. Then they find edge cases. Prices that spike too high. Discounts that go too deep. Customer segments that get squeezed out. The ongoing maintenance often costs more than the revenue gains.
Real Examples: Dynamic Pricing in SaaS
- Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, and British Airways all run sophisticated pricing algorithms that adjust fares multiple times per day. Book six months out and you get one price. Wait until two weeks before departure when seats are scarce, and the price doubles or triples. Customers accept this because they understand the logic. Seats are limited. Demand changes. Early bookers get rewarded.
- Uber's surge pricing responds to real-time supply and demand. When demand spikes during rush hour, after concerts, or during rainstorms, prices multiply. A ride that normally costs £15 might cost £45 during a 3x surge. The higher price discourages casual riders and attracts more drivers to the area, balancing supply and demand within minutes.
- Hotels pioneered dynamic pricing alongside airlines. Marriott, Hilton, and independent properties all adjust room rates based on occupancy, local events, seasonality, and booking window. The same room costs more during a conference week than a random Tuesday in January. Book directly and you might pay less than booking through an aggregator. Stay loyal and you unlock member rates.
How to Choose the Right Pricing Strategy for Your Product
You've done your homework. You know your costs, your competitors, and what customers will pay. Now comes the hard part: picking which of the four pricing strategies actually fits your situation.
Most product leaders get stuck here. They default to whatever feels familiar or copy what a competitor does. But here's what separates good pricing decisions from bad ones: matching your strategy to your specific context. Not someone else's context. Yours.
The decision comes down to four inputs from your pricing framework:
- Your business goal right now. Are you chasing growth or protecting margins?
- Your market position. Do you have solid differentiators or offer the same as everyone else?
- Your competitive landscape. Is the market crowded or relatively untapped?
- Your value clarity. Can you prove what your product delivers?
Each input pushes you toward a different strategy.
What Is a Pricing Strategy Decision Framework?
A decision framework turns a messy choice into a clear process. Instead of asking "what should we charge?" you ask a series of smaller questions. Each answer narrows your options until one strategy stands out.
Think of it like a diagnostic. A doctor doesn't just guess your condition. They ask questions, run tests, and eliminate possibilities until they arrive at the most probable diagnosis. The importance of pricing strategy shows up in how methodically you arrive at it.
Here's the basic flow:
- Start with your goal. What do you want out of the pricing.
- Check your differentiation. If customers see you as unique, value-based pricing works. If you look like everyone else, competitive pricing keeps you in the game.
- Assess value clarity. Can you prove ROI? Value-based. Can't prove it yet? Competitive or cost-plus until you can.
- Factor in market dynamics. Volatile demand or seasonal swings? Dynamic pricing captures value that fixed prices miss.
Choosing Your Business Pricing Strategy: The Bottom Line
Pricing strategy isn't a one-time decision. It's a toolkit.
The four strategies we covered, cost-plus, value-based, competitive, and dynamic, each solve different problems. Cost-plus protects margins when costs are transparent. Value-based captures what your product is actually worth to customers. Competitive keeps you in the game when markets are crowded. Dynamic adapts when demand swings unpredictably.
Your job is to match the strategy to your situation. That means understanding your business goals, your market position, your competitive landscape, and how clearly you can prove value. The framework inputs will point you toward the right approach.
FAQs
Read More Posts
.png)
The Power of Cost-Benefit Analysis for Product Teams
.png)
Navigating Client Requests: Opportunities in B2B
.png)
Product-Led Growth: Is It Right for Your Company?
.png)
Product Pricing Framework & Strategy Guide
.png)
Best Practices for Technical Product Development
.png)


